Pregnancy · Ultrasound

Estimated Fetal Weight (Hadlock)

Enter the four ultrasound biometric measurements from your latest scan to estimate fetal weight using the Hadlock IV formula — the standard equation used in modern obstetric ultrasound.

Last reviewed 22 May 2026

Hadlock IV estimated fetal weight

Estimate fetal weight from ultrasound measurements

Enter all four measurements from your latest ultrasound report (units in millimetres) to see the estimated fetal weight.

How to use this calculator

Find the four standard biometric measurements in your latest ultrasound report and enter each one in millimetres:

  • BPD — biparietal diameter (the side-to-side distance across the fetal head).
  • HC — head circumference.
  • AC — abdominal circumference.
  • FL — femur length.

The estimate appears in grams, pounds and ounces, and updates as you type.

Background — why Hadlock?

Frank Hadlock and colleagues published a series of regression equations in the 1980s that estimate fetal weight from ultrasound biometry. The four-parameter equation — usually called Hadlock IV or simply the Hadlock 1985 formula — has remained the obstetric standard since its publication. It is the calculation built into almost every modern ultrasound machine’s “EFW” readout.

The formula uses a logarithmic regression: each biometric input contributes a weighted term, plus interaction terms between AC×FL and BPD×AC, with the sum giving log₁₀ of the estimated weight in grams.

Interpreting your result

Hadlock IV has a mean prediction error of roughly ±10 to 15 % against actual birth weight when the scan is performed within a week or two of delivery. Accuracy is best in appropriately grown singletons and worse at the extremes of fetal size. Trust the growth curve more than any single number: an EFW that is on the 30th percentile and has been on the 30th percentile for the last three scans is reassuring; the same number after a previous scan at the 80th percentile is not.

Limitations

  • The formula was derived in a population of singleton, predominantly white pregnancies; performance in twins, multiples and some ethnic groups may differ.
  • Estimates near term are less reliable than mid-trimester ones because head measurements become harder to obtain reproducibly as the fetus engages.
  • EFW alone does not diagnose macrosomia or growth restriction — those are clinical diagnoses that combine biometry with growth velocity, amniotic-fluid index, Doppler indices and maternal context.
  • This tool is for informational use only. Do not change clinical care plans based on a calculated EFW without discussing the scan with the obstetric team that performed it.

Sources

  • Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements: a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:333-7.
  • Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:80-9.
  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The investigation and management of the small-for-gestational-age fetus (Green-top Guideline No. 31).

Frequently asked questions

How accurate is the Hadlock fetal-weight formula?
Hadlock IV has a mean error of about ±10–15 % vs actual birth weight. It tends to slightly over-estimate in larger fetuses and slightly under-estimate in growth-restricted ones. A single number is most useful when interpreted alongside the growth trend, gestational age, and the rest of the ultrasound — not as a standalone reading.
Which measurements do I need?
All four standard biometric measurements from your ultrasound report: biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL). Modern reports list these in millimetres — enter the numbers as they appear and the calculator handles the unit conversion.
What's the difference between Hadlock IV and earlier Hadlock formulas?
Hadlock published several equations using different combinations of measurements. The four-parameter equation (BPD + HC + AC + FL), often called Hadlock IV or Hadlock 1985, has consistently been the most accurate in subsequent validation studies and is the one used by most ultrasound machines.
Why is the estimate so different from the last scan a few weeks ago?
Fetal weight grows roughly exponentially — about 200–250 g per week in the third trimester. A 3-week gap can easily mean a 700–800 g difference. What matters clinically is the growth trajectory along a percentile curve rather than any individual number.
Should I worry about a 'big baby' or 'small baby' result?
Not on the basis of a single estimate. Macrosomia (large for gestational age) and IUGR/SGA (small for gestational age) are diagnosed by your obstetric team using growth curves, amniotic-fluid volume, Doppler studies, and clinical history. Always discuss any concerns with the clinician who ordered the scan.